Improve OTP-SECRET env var documentation #82
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for opening this pull request! Be sure to follow the pull request template!
|
I am a bot, here is the pushed image/manifest for this PR:
|
|
Please can you add the same wording for the VAPID_ envs as well. |
|
done :) |
|
I am a bot, here is the pushed image/manifest for this PR:
|
thespad
approved these changes
Nov 13, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description:
Improve OTP-SECRET env var documentation to mention that changing it will break MFA only after initial setup
Benefits of this PR and context:
The existing wording caused confusion with a user: https://discord.com/channels/354974912613449730/1172446901090648164/1172459654832468068
How Has This Been Tested?
Should be fine as long as readme/documentation still works. Not tested myself
Source / References: